Archive for October, 2005

(Something “scary” for Halloween)

So let’s suppose you have a girlfriend. And after being together for a while you let her into your place. She tends to be a bitch every now and then but the relationship’s gotten to a point where you can accept each other freely. Besides, she’s got a Long Term Plan for the both of you that’ll make things better in the future. She wants a Strong Relationship (TM) – prosperity and security for the both of you and your future children.

But then one day you come across tapes of herphone conversations with another guy. All this time she’s been screwing around your back! Granted, the tapes are from a tainted, shifty-eyed source who probably has his own agenda, but you can’t be mistaken about the fact that: 1) it was her talking and 2) something nasty was going on.

And so you confront her with this, fuming with anger, and what she does instead of moving out is ignore the issue like nothing happened and give you the silent treatment. She doesn’t even try to offer an explanation, but insists that she’s just too busy working on your Strong Relationship.

So your anger mounts, and although you’re not really a violent person you think of packing her clothes yourself and dragging her out of your home. But you’ve got to let her have her say first, and frustrated, you wait.

Weeks later she finally blurts out a response. She may have gotten “involved” with a guy (who has conveniently disappeared from the face of the planet), but it was only because she felt vulnerable at that time and thought other women wanted to take her place – so she responded pre-emptively. The rest of her half-assed apology is a slap in the face – a legal document that really gives nothing and just shores up future deniability.

She convinces you to give her due process, because even these things have rules. She must be allowed to prove her innocence. So her friends and your friends congregate for this purpose. It turns out that she’s bought off most of your friends too, and the inquiry stops over silly procedural chickenshit without the tapes and its contents ever being discussed. The whole thing turns out to be a farce. She never wanted the truth out: all she wanted was this mockery of a process, after which she can claim that she’s been tried and cleared and now that this craziness is over, the both of you can move on to develop your Strong Relationship.

You try to convince yourself this cannot be happening, and you scream to her face that without the truth, there is no relationship in the first place, and that you still want her out of your place and your life. She digs herself in. She’s willing to change the parameters of you relationship, turn it into a new system of caring, maybe even shorten her stay – but she’s not going to go without exit plan for herself. She’s willing to have a reconciliation, have a couple of bozo’s d an inquiry in a strictly confidential and non-binding fashion.

This won’t be enough, you tell her, and so you take to the streets and raise your fist to make your point. You expect her to at least understand. This was how you met her. This was how you raised her above yourself, not too long ago. Instead she goes freakin’ paranoid nuts. She claims that you and your friends are actually out to kill her, conspiring to grab her position. She makes you sleep in the sofa and makes you pay rent. And in the streets, she sics her dogs on you, and blasts you with water (a “calibrated response”) and bludgeons your head and utterly, irretrievably, breaks your heart. And now you’re lost and confused, wondering how things have gone so horribly wrong.

TO BE CONTINUED

Comments No Comments »

(reposted from the iBlog site)

Of course, if you lash out on bloggers, you can’t expect us to take it sitting down. Some great reactions online:

* From Doc Searls:

I’d like to ask Dan — and others who damn all bloggers for the sins of the few — how they’d like to read a report that calls supermarket tabloids “the newspapers” or hate sheets “the magazines.” Because that’s what happened to bloggers in this piece.

* Kurt Opsahl from the EFF has this great parody:

Printing presses are the prized platform of a public lynch mob spouting liberty but spewing lies, libel and invective. Their potent allies in this pursuit include Ben Franklin and John Hancock.

Take the tea tax. Revenue was coming, providing much needed funding to help with his Majesty’s benevolent aims in the colonies.

Then the pamphleteers attacked. A supposed crusading journalist launched a broadsheet long on invective and wobbly on facts, posting articles with his printing press calling your King “deceitful,”"unethical,”"incredibly stupid” and “a pathological liar” who had misled the colonists.

Comments No Comments »

Figured I might as well be upgrading site functionality while doing the redesign. Been updating my plugins and adding new ones. Fighting off wretched, filthy spam is a priority, so I plugged in Spam Karma 2. SK 1.2’s served me well these last few months. No spam ever got through, and no false positives so far (but then again, I get so little comment traffic).

But I’m intrigued with Akismet, which uses (I think) a global, distributed approach. Two things that stop me from using it right away though:

1. It’s tied to a central server somewhere, using data submitted by other people (I share Eric Meyer’s reservation that spammers could try to “poison the well”)

2. I had to jump through several hoops to have it installed (like getting Flock, so I can get a Wordpress.com account, so I can get a WP API key)

So right now, Akismet would have to sit idly and deactivated in my plugins manifest, until I get better feedback. Or if Spam Karma fails, which isn’t very likely.

Comments No Comments »

Starting today I hope to post more regularly to the iBlog blog. Think of it as a buildup to generate buzz and inspire themes for iBlog Summit 2. I’m going to cover, well, blogging (Pinoys blogging in particular) as well as other intarwebby things and the inevitable overlap with social and legal issues. Here’s my first go at it, perfect for Halloween:

(Got this from boingboing) It’s something I’ve been waiting for: mainstream media at its most sensational, with its audience share threatened and its corporate sponsors reeling, lashes back at blogs. It turns out now that we are part of ” an online lynch mob spouting liberty but spewing lies, libel and invective”. Ouch.

A sidebar to the article then discusses how one can “fight back”. This includes:

BUILD A BLOG SWARM. Reach out to key bloggers and get them on your side. Lavish them with attention. Or cash.Earlier this year Marqui, a tiny Portland, Ore. software shop, began paying 21 bloggers $800 per month to post items about Marqui, while requiring them to disclose the payments. Marqui’s listings soared on Google from 2,000 to 250,000 results. Never mind that one blogger took the money and bashed a Marqui marketing strategy anyway.

BASH BACK. If you get attacked, dig up dirt on your assailant and feed it to sympathetic bloggers. Discredit him.

ATTACK THE HOST. Find some copyrighted text that a blogger has lifted from your Web site and threaten to sue his Internet service provider under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. That may prompt the ISP to shut him down. Or threaten to drag the host into a defamation suit against the blogger. The host isn’t liable but may skip the hassle and cut off the blogger’s access anyway. Also:Subpoena the host company, demanding the blogger’s name or Internet address.

SUE THE BLOGGER. If all else fails, you can sue your attacker for defamation, at the risk of getting mocked. You will have to chase him for years to collect damages. Settle for a court order forcing him to take down his material.

Now, the article is obviously trollbait, but it shows that we’re not all safe in our own little worlds. Outside the walls, people are sulking and plotting deep into the night. And it’s not like mainstream media and Big Money are the only ones looking for payback. Governments and administrations are out for blood (sometimes, more literally than figuratively). It reminds me of Dean Jorge Bocobo’s fears that something as apparently harmless as TouchGraph could be used on a blog “clampdown”. As blogging spreads and grows in influence, expect more flashpoints of conflict, maybe even full-scale Blog Wars.

Comments 4 Comments »

Comments No Comments »

Comments 1 Comment »

I’m carrying out a day-by-day redesign. All the old features (and then some) will be back up by the end of the process.

The new theme is triSexuality Standard, by Scott Jarkoff. I’ve decided to go 3-column and full screen. Over the next few days I plan to implement:

- the del.icio.us sideblog – DONE
- a status page (everyone needs a good status page) – DONE
- a panel for recent comments – DONE
- a panel for recent posts – DONE
- site-wide search – DONE
- a photo or two in the about page (no photos in the about page creeps people out, says Jakob Nielsen) – DONE
- gravatar support in the comments section – DONE
- upgrade the creative commons license – DONE
- a better archive – DONE
- something like kottke’s “further afield”DONE
- smooth mini icons – DONE
- a better spam-trap – DONE, but i got akismet installed and ready to go just in case
- more accessible web feeds – DONE

Comments 2 Comments »