The way our imported judicial system works, at least in the 2-dimensional world we law students live in, is that you go to court for vindication of your rights, and if you prevail (through merit, of course) – you get these court orders, or writs. They work like scripts – bits of code that gets things done. With these nifty court orders, you can adopt a child, or change your name, or get financial support from your asshole husband.
And then there are the more serious, heavier writs. They go from way back, and are considered cornerstones of our legal tradition. Which explains for why they’re in latin, and sound like spells from Harry Potter. Surely you’ve heard of habeas corpus, which enables you to appear before a court and ask (in essence) “Hey, why am I, like, in jail?” It’s supposed to be a really big thing when you’re in a democracy – you can’t be deprived freedom without legal basis, and habeas corpus precisely enables you to examine the legality of your detention.
And then there’s certiorari. It’s just like an appeal. Only it’s really not. Judges and officials make honest mistakes. They may fail to grasp the ramifications of the evidence, or misinterpret the law. You use your vanilla-flavored appeal to question their conclusions. But what if it’s not just the conclusion that’s wrong, but the very decision-making process (or decision maker) that’s tainted. You ask for a writ of certiorari – to review and set aside capricious, whimsical, or maybe just utterly boneheaded abuses of discretion.
The Ombudsman recently decided that COMELEC officials weren’t liable for the 1.3 billion-peso clusterfuck that was the election automated project. This despite the Supreme Court’s previous findings of illegality surrounding the contract. This despite the recommendations of her own investigating officer. This despite the her own resolution barely three months before her inexplicable flip-flop.
That’s what been keeping me up all night for the past few days. That is my outrage of the moment. That is why I have to research for and footnote a mean “cert” petition that will, hopefully, bring this crufty Ombudsman before the Supreme Court so that she can explain how things could have gone terribly terribly wrong.
Game’s on. Oh it is so on.

Entries (RSS)
October 24th, 2006 at 12:22 am
aha. i now finally understand what you’ve been up to. Nayna’s been explaining it to me, but i had to read this thrice to get it. hehe.
But for the sleepless nights, (and i mean this without sarcasm) How very, very noble of you.
Now, shall we proceed from losing battles to battles that have yet to be fought? ;-p
kelan tayo coffee??! Recharge and then i’ll see you soon! we missed you! mwahahaha.
P.s. Hope your hair is still cute. i will check up on you (raymond k hessel..)!
October 24th, 2006 at 2:48 pm
what? what’s happened? i should keep up with what’s happening in the world more. sigh.
October 24th, 2006 at 3:02 pm
well, our COMELEC spent 1.3 billion pesos on an automated election system that wasn’t any good. the court ruled that the purchase was null and void, and gave the case back to the ombudsman so that she can investigate and haul to jail those responsible. ombudsman says: well, they’re all squeaky clean.
bollocks.
October 25th, 2006 at 5:33 pm
oh. oh. okay. i get it now. maybe the ombudsgirl was in on it.
October 26th, 2006 at 11:04 am
yeah, the assholes. 1.3 billion! Btw, Ano yung ruling? when will you know the results?
Btw, losing battles –i was referring to your previous allusion ha. not this case. wala lang, just clarifying.
uy, hindi ko ma-open yung mindmap mo! hehehe.