A Pinoy Blog About Nothing

Putting the Hay in Mabuhay!

Crowdsourcing my Reading List

The wife and I just spent an incredible year with the baby. She’s grown a lot and we’re extremely proud of her hitting her developmental milestones. I’m looking forward to answering all sorts of questions from her because it seems that we have one curious child on our hands.

That said, my reading list from last year was pretty much non-existent. In fact, aside from the usual magazines, graphic novels, online articles, child-caring literature, assigned readings and the course textbooks it’s pretty much dismal.

This year, I’ve decided to ease back on the reading of non-magazine, non-comics, non-online, non-baby, non-school related books. For 2010, I need to read at least 12 new books both in fiction and non-fiction. I know 12 is a low number; in the past I know I can make that in just a quarter. But with everything happening now, that would still pose a challenge.

I’m looking for suggestions for the reading list. I’m just looking for something interesting to read, hopefully available at our local library (or if it looks really interesting, there’s always Amazon). I’ve looked at some interesting titles below to give you some idea of my interests but no book is too far out for me to try it.

The 2010 Reading List so far (This is in no way final. Suggestions welcome.)

1. Fifty Dangerous Things (You Should Let Your Children Do)

2. How The Mighty Fall: And Why Some Companies Never Give In

3. Tribes: We Need You to Lead Us

4. Epicenter 2.0: Why the Current Rumblings in the Middle East Will Change Your Future

5. The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right

6. Buyology: Truth and Lies About Why We Buy

7. Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies

8. The Lightning Thief

9. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo

Superhero Facebook Status Updates

statuspunisher1

Hilarious post by the folks at Comics Alliance. Loved the one by Lois Lane (for a Pulitzer Prize winning reporter, she sure is dense).

My Twitter Manifesto

Since I can’t fit my Twitter policy on my Twitter profile blurb, I’m taking a page from @missbossy’s playbook and made a post about my own personal Twitter policy:

Why I Follow:

  • Intentional or not, I find you funny.
  • I follow people who I know in real life (well, those I like anyway).
  • When you follow me, please don’t expect that I will follow you automatically. I’m not in a race to have x number of followers. I’d like to maintain a manageable number of people to follow because I believe it’s impossible to read posts from a huge number of sources. Personally on Twitter, it’s quality over quantity.
  • If I’m a fan of your work, I’ll follow you.
  • If you’re in the same industry, I’ll follow you. (Especially if you’re a competitor.)
  • I follow people from everywhere not just from my immediate location.
  • If you have interesting posts yet you don’t link to a website, I’ll have second thoughts following you. I’m wary of people who only take to Twitter for marketing purposes and a lack of website where I can at least contextualize your posts sends up a red flag.
  • I don’t follow joke accounts.


  • Why I Unfollow:

  • You haven’t posted on your account for a long time. I’ve noticed inactive accounts tend to get hijacked by spammers.
  • You’re a serial ReTweeter (RT). Look, I probably follow the same people you do. There will be overlaps. Occasional RTs are good but if 5 of your last 10 posts were just RTs I’m better off following people you’ve been RT-ing. I followed you because I think your original posts were interesting.
  • Unless we’re friends in real life, I don’t really care what you had for lunch. Occasional personal posts are okay but if you constantly whine about your work, your boss, your girl/boyfriend — I’m sorry but we must part ways. I have my own stuff to deal with and I don’t have to put up with yours. If you must whine, at least make it entertaining for all of us.
  • When you say “I just need x number of followers to reach xxx,xxx – tell your friends!” – it would earn you an automatic Unfollow. Because I’m a dick like that.
  • You’re a hash tag whore. One or two hash tags per post, I can understand. Any more than that and you’re just looking for attention.
  • You’re a Follow Friday enthusiast. Three consecutive posts filled with people you think other people should follow is bad form my friend. I’m sorry to say, those people get lost in all those @ in your post. And if I like your posts, I most probably looked through your Following list already anyway.
  • While I don’t enjoy being in an echo chamber, I also don’t like having a discussion with a troll. I don’t mind you disagreeing – as long you don’t do it in a disagreeable manner.


  • Why I Block:

  • You mentioned SEO guru, social media expert, etc in your profile YET your posts suggest nothing but cheap tricks designed to game search engines.
  • You promised 1000x increase in followers if I clicked on a link.
  • Your username has numbers on them, your profile pic is that of a scantily clad woman, you follow over a thousand people yet your follower count is just 2 digits and your previous 150 posts were sent via API and were made on the same day.
  • The url on your Twitter profile is from a url-shortening service.

  • What I find Interesting:

    Philippines, Philippine politics, Philippine culture, Filipino diaspora, Filipino-American identity, American politics, history, beaches, entrepreneurship, small businesses, project management, mobile technology, mobile OS, mobile wireless, fighting cancer, cancer awareness, computer technology literacy, bridging the digital divide, OLPC, Filipino food, exotic cuisine, good eats, great restaurants, pop culture, geekery, action figures, comic books, movies, good books, sci-fi, horror, steampunk, writers, novelists, great quotations, funny videos, things that make you go WTF, humor, wit, & sexy geeks.

    Annotating Ashton Kutcher’s Victory Speech

    Hey congrats on beating CNN on reaching 1 million followers on Twitter. I just wish you didn’t pull that stunt though.

    Look, at the end of the day, what’s this about? This is about the changing of the guard, from the old way of consuming media to the new way of consuming media.

    Sorry dude. It already happened. It’s called the Internet.

    We together, can decide, we can make the news on our cell phones, on our iPhones, on our cameras, on our video cameras. We can edit the news, we can broadcast the news, and we can consume the news. We can decide what news we want to hear, how we want to hear it, when we want to hear it. And we can get it faster on the web. That’s all we’re saying.

    Again, the 90s called – it wants its paradigm shift back.

    And it’s not about me, it’s not about anything, any accolade I’m trying to achieve.

    No! Really? Is that why you went into acting? Actors don’t like the attention? Is that why you continue to leverage your fame from playing a dumb jock on the 70s Show & a moron on Dude Where’s My Car into producing shows like Punk’d and the ’social experiment’ Beauty & the Geek? It had nothing to do with promoting your web production company? It had nothing to do with the need to be constantly in the public eye and the media? And you know…being an actor?

    It’s really about us and, uh, it’s about a statement that one man can have a voice that’s as loud as an entire media company. And you can have that voice as well.

    …as long as you’re a Hollywood actor and married to a beautiful Hollywood actress.

    And we can all have that voice together. And, and, and we can change media forever. That’s just the start. I dunno, um, maybe that was a little too preachy?

    And how exactly are you going to help us with that? Retweet everything people address to you. So instead of a media company filtering through the news, you’d get to do that?

    While I appreciate your 100k donation to help stop malaria (sincerely I do), you could’ve done that earlier on and not held the donation hostage if you reached 1 million followers. It was like saying “I’ll kill this puppy if I don’t reach 1M followers.” Or you could have promised to donate a dollar for every follower you get at a certain date, whether or not you reached 1 million followers. Disguising your drive to 1M as some charity stunt to prove you can do better than CNN was, in the end, purely for your ego.

    Sure people called your PR exercise fun. I think it would’ve been more fun if you promised to shave your eyebrows or something if you reached 1M. I’d be in on that. Now that would’ve been fun. What you did succeed in doing is placing the focus on the wrong aspect of Twitter. Now every celeb would think ‘hey I’m more popular than Ashton, I could totally go beyond 1M.’ You’ll be lying if you say you’ll be reading each and every post from your 1M followers – just not physically possible.

    Twitter’s value to me has always been the information shared from each contact. What you did succeed in doing is putting old media Hollywood thinking into Twitter, ie the bigger the audience you have, the better. The few quality posts/Tweets from people who share my same interests has bigger value to me than having xxx,xxx,xxx of followers. If what you have to say is interesting enough, people will repost it for you. Also, I can only imagine how many fake accounts were made to contribute to your win. Already a web community notorious for gaming web polls wants to top your 1M followers. So yeah thanks for the spam accounts.

    But there is also one other thing I can thank you for doing – we at least know Twitter can handle a million followers on one account. Now Twitter’s figuring out how to handle all those people trying to unfollow you all at the same time. Thanks for the stress test.

    I wished you stayed off my Internet, Kelso. Enjoy the backlash and the nerd rage.

    Inspired by the snark found here:

    http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2009/04/kutcher_twitter.html

    Watchmen: Hurm!

    watchmen

    And so it came to pass. The much anticipated movie in comic geekdom has finally arrived: Warner Bros’ film adaptation of Watchmen arrived last March 6 amidst hype and trepidation. I finally got to see it earlier tonight, choosing not to force the issue of having to juggle schedules on opening night. Had it been another Christopher Nolan Batman or Guillermo del Toro’s Hobbit, I’d probably make an exception. However, given Zack Snyder’s slavish adaptation of Frank Miller’s 300 and thanks to the advance hype machine that gave us glimpses of the set (oooh photos of the Gunga Diner! The newstand!) I already knew what kind of movie to expect (also, the online world didn’t wait too long to give its verdict on the movie).

    My take on it? For a movie, it’s a great comic book. I didn’t hate what Snyder did to Watchmen. I also won’t rave about it as I did Nolan’s Dark Knight. If someone was to ask me if he or she should read the book or watch the movie, I’d recommend them to read the book first. The movie becomes a supplement to a very dense novel – a Cliffs Note if you will, with an okay soundtrack and perfect casting of the characters. If you must watch the movie, do yourself the favor of watching it in the theater as it is one of those movies which was made for the big screen, no matter how hi-def your home TV maybe. Spoilers ahead.

    Read the rest of this entry »

    What was Superman Singing?

    Found at Dr. K’s 100-Page Super Spectacular:

    In Final Crisis 7, Superman finally kills Darkseid by singing a song into the newly constructed Miracle Machine. Morrison doesn’t let the reader know exactly what song Superman sings, but instead leaves it up to the reader to fill in this particular gap.

    Here’s my take:

    Song at the End of the World

    Song at the End of the World

    Because I’d like to think Kal-El likes old school Pinoy rock.

    Hope

    “We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself…”

                                   -Barack Obama, Inaugural Address, 20 January 2009

    hopesmall A baby girl will be born during the early days of the Barack Obama Administration. In the next 4 years, as she learns to crawl, walk and talk, her mother and father will be watching the news and reading about Obama’s successes and failures.

    Her parents, both immigrants, have long admired Obama and his beginnings. They can certainly relate to the role of his family played in shaping his values. Her grandparents were products of families who tilled the land to put their children through good schools. Her parents, in turn, made the choice to leave family and friends and the safety of homogeneity of their homeland to seek opportunities elsewhere. They did this knowing that one day, she will come into their lives. They did this to give her more choices in her life.

    If Obama runs and wins a re-election bid, she will probably remember seeing this man on the television (or most probably on the Web) as the President. At that early age, she might not know or care that Obama is the first African-American President of the United States of America. She will look at this man and see a man of color leading the country. She will simply know him as the President. By 8 years old, as Obama and the nation look back at his accomplishments, she will learn more about this man. She will know more about her heritage. She will look at this man and she will know then that she could be anything she wants to be.

    At least that’s what her parents hope for her.